But Torres emphasized that time was against them, saying it would have taken two-to-three weeks to get set. Twelve days later, the ambassador was killed. Torres learned of the attacks by watching television. He called the circumstances leading up to the tragedy bad decision-making from top to bottom. There was nothing we couldve done about. If wed had one month warning who knows what mightve happened, Owens said.
2012 Benghazi attack, wikipedia
Is a teeny, tiny, little security company registered in Wales that had never had a diplomatic security contract, had never done any high threat contracts anywhere else in the world that weve been able to find, much less in high threat areas for the. They had a few guys on the ground, he said. According to torres, the Blue mountain Group came in 4 percent lower than their bid and they challenged the decision, claiming the American company should have been preferred over the foreign one. Torres said State department contracting officer Jan Visintainer responded that the State department had the latitude to apply that preference or not. And there was more: The Blue mountain Group hired guards through another company who were not armed. One month before the attack — in August 2012, with The Blue mountain Group still in charge of essay compound security — ambassador Stevens and his team alerted the State department via diplomatic cable that radical Islamic groups were everywhere and that the temporary annual mission compound. The classified cable was first reported by fox News. 31, 2012, the situation had deteriorated to the point that Owens and Torres said the State department asked them to intervene as Owens put it, an admission of the mistake of choosing the wrong company. They came back to us and said, can you guys come in and take over security? So we were ready.
Brad Owens, owens, a former Army intelligence officer, echoed his colleague, saying those who made the poor choices that actually, i would say, were more responsible for the benghazi attacks than anyone else, theyre still in the same positions, making security choices for our embassies. In 2012, Owens was the American companys point man in Libya with extensive experience in the region. After the death of Libyan dictator muammar Qaddafi in the fall of 2011, Owens stressed to fox News it was well-known that Islamic radicals including Al qaeda-tied militias were pouring into the region and security had deteriorated considerably. Based on story documents reviewed by fox News, torres Advanced Enterprise solutions bid on the benghazi compound security contract in the spring of 2012. But the State department awarded the deal to. K.-based operation called The Blue mountain Group. Owens, who had personally visited the benghazi compound to assess security, was shocked.
Jerry torres, ceo of blume Torres Advanced Enterprise solutions, shown here in Afghanistan. Torres Advanced Enterprise solutions provides security for. Embassy and consulate personnel around the world in some of the most dangerous locations spanning Africa, the middle east and south America, according to the firm. Jerry torres remains haunted by the fact specific bureaucrats and policies remain in the State department after the benghazi attack despite the change in administrations. . Ambassador is dead and nobody is held accountable for. And three guys all died trying to defend him, said Torres, the companys ceo and a former Green Beret. Asked if there was a specific effort by a senior State department contracting officer to silence them, torres said, Absolutely, absolutely.
Read more: follow us: @washtimes on Twitter. Related Topics: Free speech Legal Case, islamist violence or Threats of Physical violence Against Speech, oic defamation, pressure tactics Against Free speech, sharia in the west, united Nations other International Groups, willful Blindness pc problems receive the latest by email: subscribe to the legal project's. Posted on, september 13, 2017 by, admin, fox News, by catherine herridge sept. 12, 2017: exclusive: Security at the State departments Benghazi compound was so dire that another contractor was brought in to clean up the mess just two weeks before the 2012 terror attack and was later pressured to keep quiet by a government bureaucrat under then-Secretary. Brad Owens and Jerry torres, of Torres Advanced Enterprise solutions, say they faced pressure to stay silent and get on the same page with the State department with regard to the security lapses that led to the deaths of four Americans. They spoke exclusively with Fox News for Tucker Carlson Tonight, revealing new information that undermines the State departments account of the 2012 terror attack in Benghazi, where Islamic militants launched a 13-hour assault from Sept. 11-12 that killed. Ambassador Chris Stevens, foreign service officer sean Smith and former navy seals ty woods and Glenn Doherty.
Benghazi: The definitive report - kindle edition
"What it turned into — and I don't think michael ever knew this, it's something to watch for how in his testimony this week — was, 'let's hand this thing to the. Ambassador and make it what she should say. "That's a big deal the day former official said. "It's one thing to prepare something for lawmakers so they don't make a mistake or say something inaccurate. It's quite another matter to have that feed the administration's then-current, definitive account of what had actually happened in Benghazi." "There are a lot of twists and turns in this added another former intelligence official. "A lot of it hangs on the fact that the agency thought they were crafting these talking points for Dutch Ruppersberger and mike rogers, not the White house.".
Copyright 2014 The washington Times, llc. Click here for reprint permission. About the author, guy taylor, guy taylor is the national Security team leader at The washington Times, overseeing the paper's State department, pentagon and intelligence community coverage. He's also a frequent guest on The McLaughlin Group and c-span. His series on political, economic and security developments in Mexico won a 2012 Virginia press Association award. Prior to rejoining The times in 2011, his work was.
Morell's personal role in editing and rewriting the talking points. "Morell noted that these points were not good and he had taken a heavy editing hand to them an Obama administration official wrote Mrs. Rice on the morning of Sept. What is not clear is whether the email was in any way referring to the conflicting intelligence streams about a protest in Benghazi. Alternatively, the email notes that. Morell was uncomfortable with an initial draft of the talking points batted back and forth between White house and cia officials "because they seemed to encourage the reader to infer incorrectly that the cia had warned about a specific attack" in Benghazi.
During interviews with The times, several former senior intelligence officials have lamented the whole "talking points" issue, saying the cia was caught in the middle of the White house, congress and the reality on the ground in Benghazi while crafting the points. The reason the cia ended up taking the lead on the talking points was because, as news of the attack was breaking around the world, lawmakers on the house intelligence committee were seeking guidance from the agency on how to respond to media questions without. Mike rogers, michigan Republican and the committee chairman, and ranking Democrat. Dutch Ruppersberger of Maryland asked for the guidance. One former senior intelligence official told The times that as word circulated through the inner circles of the intelligence community that the cia was working on the talking points, officials within the Obama administration steered the mission toward crafting something Mrs. Rice could say on national talk shows. "In essence, the talking points got repurposed the former official said.
Deception: The making of the video hillary
Multiple sources confirmed to The times on Monday that the station chief's email. Morell was written after one of the teleconferences during which senior cia officials in Washington —. Morell among them — made clear to the Tripoli station chief that they were examining alternative information that suggested there was a protest before the attack. After the exchange,. Morell signed off on the cia talking points given to Mrs. Rice promoting what turned out to be the false narrative of a protest. The development ultimately triggered an angry reaction from Republicans, who have long claimed that the Obama administration, with an eye on the november elections, was downplaying the role of terrorists in order to protect the president's record on counterterrorism. Documents since released by the White animals house show that administration officials boasted in internal emails at the time about.
Lawmakers are likely to press. Morell for a reaction to reports this week that a classified Senate intelligence report has concluded that harsh interrogation methods used in the years after Sept. 11 provided no key evidence in the hunt for Osama bin Laden and that the cia misled Congress on the matter. The cia disputes that conclusion. The senate panel is expected to vote Thursday on sending the Obama administration a 400-page executive summary of dissertation the "enhanced interrogation" report to start a monthslong declassification process. One of the key issues likely to come up during the house hearing involves what was said during a series of secure teleconferences between cia officials in Washington and Libya from the time of the attack on Sept. 11, 2012, to the completion of Mrs. Rice's talking points for dissemination on the sunday talk shows Sept.
about the benghazi attack as the talking points were being crafted. "That's why they ultimately came up with the analysis that they did the source said. "The piece that was coming out of Tripoli was important, but it was one piece amid several streams of information.". One of the former intelligence officials said the libya station chief's assessment was being weighed against media reports from the ground in Benghazi that"d witnesses as saying there had been a protest. Analysts at the cia, the source said, also were weighing it against reporting by other intelligence divisions, including the national Security Agency. "The chief of station in Tripoli who was 600 or 700 miles away from the attacks wouldn't necessarily have the only view of what actually went on in Benghazi that former official said. Christopher Stevens and three other Americans were killed in the attack. While the testimony is expected to focus on Benghazi, the hearing arrives at a time of growing tensions between Congress and the cia over such matters as the bush administration's interrogation rules and mutual charges of spying and illegality between the senate intelligence committee and.
Morell and others at the cia explicitly shared the station chief's assessment with the White house or State department. Two former intelligence officials have told The washington Times that this question likely will be answered at a wednesday hearing of the house permanent Select Committee on Intelligence during which. Morell is scheduled to give his retrolisthesis public testimony. Morell, who has since left the cia, declined to comment on the matter Monday. He now works at beacon Global Strategies, a washington insider strategic communications firm. One former intelligence official close. Morell told The times on the condition of anonymity that "the whole question of communication with the station chief will be addressed in his testimony." "We're confident that it will clarify the situation in the minds of many who are asking the former official said. Another former intelligence official told The times that. Morell did tell the White house and the State department that the cia station chief in Libya had concluded that there was no protest but senior Obama administration and cia officials in Washington ignored the assessment.
13 hours (2016 )
Before the Obama administration gave an inaccurate narrative on national television that the benghazi attacks grew from an anti-American protest, the cia's station chief in Libya pointedly told his superiors in Washington that no such demonstration occurred, documents and interviews with current and former intelligence. The attack was "not an escalation of protests the station chief wrote to then-Deputy cia director Michael. Morell in an email dated Sept. 15, 2012 — a full day before the White house sent Susan. Rice to several Sunday talk shows to disseminate talking points claiming that the benghazi attack began as a protest over an anti-Islam video. That the talking points used by Mrs. Rice, who was then. Ambassador to the United Nations, were written by a cia that ignored the assessment by its own station chief inside libya, has emerged as one of the major bones of contention in the more than the two years of political fireworks and congressional investigations into the. What has never been made public is whether.